Extraordinary Business
Links
Previous Posts
- Have We Become An Angry Society?
- I'm Outta Here!
- This blog has moved
- What we can still learn from Apollo 13
- Toyota, what have you done?!?
- Changing the way we hire.
- The Year of Performance
- The evils of email
- A Discussion on Change Management and How to Make ...
- China 2.0: Understanding what it takes to open doo...
archives
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- October 2006
- December 2006
- February 2007
- April 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- January 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- June 2008
- September 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- August 2010
Keeping it all in check
Posted Thursday, April 13, 2006
Recently I met with a client and we discussed the challenges of leadership. As we continued our discussion, the subject of time came up. He shared a comment that I believe is prevalent in many other businesses and leaders alike. He knew follow up was important as well as communication and accountability. But He did not have the time to follow through on these commitments because of the day to day business, being short-staffed, and other duties required by his employer.
As a leader I can relate to this because I experienced it several times throughout my career. I also learned that the consequences of not taking action far outweigh the work needed to do the right thing.
We like our comfort zones. To some degree they bring us satisfaction. They keep us safe within a world of predictability. And even if the outcome isn't what we would like or expect, we may refuse to deviate from these actions.
Let's look at our example. By failing to hold people accountable, you create more work for yourself to make sure the job is done right. In addition, not using effective communication will lead to more questions, more confusion, and more mistakes. This leads to more notes, more follow up, more interruptions, slower turn times, and decreased productivity. Because there is decreased productivity, there is increased work. When there is increased work, you give more projects to the people you know you can count on. This creates resentment from the others who aren't carrying their load which leads to favoritism and passiveness. The top performers get burnt out because the bulk of the work is placed on them to complete. They in turn become resentful because they are doing the work for the same pay as the ones who are not. Because there is no accountability, the ones not doing the work do not receive the feedback or the support to be more effective. In addition, they are not counseled because there is no documentation or follow up.
Over the long term, you develop an organization that becomes overburdened with inefficiencies, lagging sales and service. This may lead to downsizing to "trim the fat" of the organization and aid the bottom line. Now the top performers are burdened even more. And the cycle continues..
So before you say you don't have enough time to lead your people, consider the consequences of your actions. The time you spend now may save you and your organization in the long run.
As a leader I can relate to this because I experienced it several times throughout my career. I also learned that the consequences of not taking action far outweigh the work needed to do the right thing.
We like our comfort zones. To some degree they bring us satisfaction. They keep us safe within a world of predictability. And even if the outcome isn't what we would like or expect, we may refuse to deviate from these actions.
Let's look at our example. By failing to hold people accountable, you create more work for yourself to make sure the job is done right. In addition, not using effective communication will lead to more questions, more confusion, and more mistakes. This leads to more notes, more follow up, more interruptions, slower turn times, and decreased productivity. Because there is decreased productivity, there is increased work. When there is increased work, you give more projects to the people you know you can count on. This creates resentment from the others who aren't carrying their load which leads to favoritism and passiveness. The top performers get burnt out because the bulk of the work is placed on them to complete. They in turn become resentful because they are doing the work for the same pay as the ones who are not. Because there is no accountability, the ones not doing the work do not receive the feedback or the support to be more effective. In addition, they are not counseled because there is no documentation or follow up.
Over the long term, you develop an organization that becomes overburdened with inefficiencies, lagging sales and service. This may lead to downsizing to "trim the fat" of the organization and aid the bottom line. Now the top performers are burdened even more. And the cycle continues..
So before you say you don't have enough time to lead your people, consider the consequences of your actions. The time you spend now may save you and your organization in the long run.




